Errors carbon dating
In short, carbon dating is as useful as any other technique, so long as it’s done properly and the results are objectively interpreted.It is not, however, an inherently error-free or black-and-white method for dating objects.As samples get older, errors are magnified, and assumptions can render carbon dating all but useless.For example, variations in greenhouse effects and solar radiation change how much carbon-14 a living organism is exposed to, which drastically changes the “starting point” from which a radiocarbon dating test is based.When an organism dies, it stops taking in new carbon-14, and whatever is inside gradually decays into other elements.Carbon-14 normally makes up about 1 trillionth (1/1,000,000,000,000) of the earth’s atmosphere.
Two plants that died at the same moment, but which naturally contained different levels of radiocarbon, could be dated to drastically different times.Scientists must assume how much carbon-14 was in the organism when it died.Complicating matters is the fact that Earth’s carbon-14 concentrations change drastically based on various factors.Modern effects such as fossil fuel burning and nuclear testing have also changed atmospheric carbon-14 levels and in turn change the “starting point” for a radiocarbon test.All in all, setting the parameters of the carbon-14 test is more of an art than a science.
Search for errors carbon dating:
If the spear head is dated using animal bones nearby, the accuracy of the results is entirely dependent on the assumed link between the spear head and the animal.